top of page
  • Writer's pictureRuban Phukan

From LMS to AI Co-Pilot - The Pedagogy Shift To Mitigate The Organizational Skills Crisis


The evolution of L&D technology
The evolution of L&D technology

As we navigate through the 21st century, the landscape of Learning & Development (L&D) technology has undergone profound transformations, marking the evolution from Learning 1.0 to the revolutionary horizon of Learning 3.0. This journey reflects a broader shift in the paradigms of educational technology, mirroring the fast-paced changes in the global workforce and the increasingly complex skills required in modern workplaces.


From Learning 1.0 to Learning 2.0: The Foundation

The inception of Learning 1.0, characterized by traditional Learning Management Systems (LMS), laid the groundwork for structured online education and training. These systems streamlined the administration, documentation, tracking, and reporting of training programs. Despite their utility, Learning 1.0 technologies were primarily designed with a top-down approach to learning, focusing on content delivery and completion over the actual absorption and application of knowledge.

Emerging from the limitations of Learning 1.0, Learning 2.0 introduced Learning Experience Platforms (LXP), signifying a shift towards more personalized, learner-centric experiences. LXPs addressed some of Learning 1.0's constraints by incorporating limited AI capabilities to recommend personalized learning paths and promoting a culture of continuous, self-directed learning. While Learning 2.0 represented a significant step forward, integrating external content and fostering engagement, it still fell short of fully bridging the skills development gap. The primary focus remained on guiding learners through a predefined repository of content, rather than truly tailoring the learning experience to individual needs and real-time skill requirements.


Why LMS and LXP Fail to Deliver Proper Skills Development

In the eras of Learning 1.0 and 2.0, content stood as the cornerstone of the L&D framework. Both Learning Management Systems and Learning Experience Platforms were primarily designed around the creation, delivery, and management of content. This content-centric approach, while effective in structuring learning paths, brought with it significant challenges. Content development is not only expensive but also time-consuming, requiring a substantial investment of resources to create, update, and maintain. In a world where the shelf life of skills is shrinking and new technologies emerge at an unprecedented pace, this lag in content development poses a critical bottleneck. Organizations found themselves struggling to keep their training programs aligned with the latest skills requirements, making it increasingly difficult to respond agilely to the demands of a rapidly changing environment. 

Despite the best efforts of L&D teams, the real-world results are dismal, as revealed by various surveys done by Harvard and McKinsey:


  • The average online learning course completion rate is 3–6%

  • 75% of employees were dissatisfied with their company’s L&D function

  • 70% of employees report that they don’t have mastery of the skills needed to do their jobs

  • Only 12% of employees apply new skills learned in L&D programs to their jobs

  • Only 25% of employees believe that training measurably improved performance at work


And this is when employees clearly need to learn on the job. Based on insights from LinkedIn Learning:


  • Nearly half (49%) of individuals express a desire for learning opportunities that are available precisely when they're needed.

  • A majority (58%) of employees advocate for the ability to control their learning tempo, indicating a strong preference for self-paced educational experiences.

  • Over two-thirds (68%) of workers show a preference for learning directly within their work environment, emphasizing the value of on-the-job training.


This is unfortunate because this isn't a fault of the L&D function but a limitation of the technology available to them to deliver workplace learning, which is why change is important. 


The one-size-fits-all content models of Learning Management Systems (LMS) and Learning Experience Platforms (LXP) reveal a significant shortfall: their failure to engage learners effectively. The time commitment required from learners to engage with these platforms is often incompatible with the demands of a busy work schedule. Most professionals, already time-starved, find it challenging to dedicate long hours to learning, especially when the content is laden with a wide breadth of details, most of which aren't relevant to everyone. While comprehensive courses may benefit beginners, seasoned professionals seek the essence of what they need to know—succinct, applicable insights that can be immediately integrated into their work. This gap highlights the need for hyper-personalization of the learning experience, tailoring not just the content but the entire learning path to match the individual goals, proficiency levels, and preferences of each learner. Furthermore, the reliance on single modalities and a lack of interactivity further exacerbate learner disengagement, pointing to a critical need for more dynamic, interactive, and hyper-personalized learning solutions.


Moreover, a fundamental limitation inherent in the frameworks of Learning Management Systems (LMS) and Learning Experience Platforms (LXP) is their predominantly manual-driven nature. This characteristic poses a significant challenge to scalability. In an era where hyper-personalization of the learning experience is not just a preference but a necessity, the manual curation and administration of content for hundreds or thousands of employees become an insurmountable task. The essence of delivering a learning experience that is meticulously tailored to the unique needs, goals, and proficiency levels of each individual learner is beyond the realm of manual capabilities. It's not just a question of efficiency; it's a matter of feasibility both from time scale and costs. The sheer volume of personalized content required, coupled with the dynamic nature of skill demands in the modern workplace, makes manual personalization not just challenging but humanly unscalable.


These limitations underscored the need for automation to create a dynamic, adaptable approach to learning, setting the stage for the emergence of Learning 3.0 and the AI Co-Pilot model, where the focus shifts from content consumption to skill adaptability and real-time learning.


Learning 3.0: A Leap Forward

The advent of Learning 3.0, marked by the rise of AI Co-Pilots, represents a paradigm shift in L&D technology. Unlike its predecessors, Learning 3.0 is not just an incremental improvement but a leap into a future where learning is deeply personalized, contextually integrated, and dynamically adaptive to the changing demands of the workplace. AI Co-Pilots transcend traditional content delivery, offering a two-way, conversational learning experience that evolves in real-time, tailored to the learner's current knowledge, skills, and job requirements.


The automation, with an AI-first approach in Learning 3.0 technology, delivers at an unprecedented speed, scale, and cost-effectiveness. 


The Burgeoning Skills Crisis For Organizations

The urgency to transition to Learning 3.0 is underscored by the stark realities of the global skills crisis. According to a McKinsey report, a staggering 87% of companies are already grappling with skill gaps or expect to within a few years. Furthermore, the World Economic Forum projects that 1 billion people worldwide will need to be reskilled by 2030 to meet the demands of the evolving job market. The cost of failing to address these skill gaps is monumental, with Korn Ferry estimating a potential loss of $8.7 trillion in annual revenue by 2030 due to talent shortages. This crisis highlights not just the inadequacy of traditional learning systems in keeping pace with the skills required for future jobs but also the critical need for a paradigm shift in how learning and development are approached. 


The AI Co-Pilot model, with its ability to offer real-time, adaptive learning experiences, emerges as a vital solution to navigate and mitigate the impact of the global skills crisis, ensuring that both individuals and organizations can thrive in the face of rapid technological and economic changes.


Addressing the Skills Gap with AI

The significant limitations of Learning 1.0 and 2.0 in filling the skills development gap become apparent in the face of rapidly evolving job roles and the constant emergence of new technologies. The everything-manual nature of traditional L&D approaches is ill-equipped to cope with the pace of change and time-to-market needs. Also, content production and maintenance costs burden the already shrinking corporate budgets. This leads to a widening skills gap that threatens organizational competitiveness and growth.


Learning 3.0, facilitated by AI Co-Pilots, addresses these challenges head-on by making learnability—the ability to learn new skills and adapt to changes fast—a core outcome of the learning process. By focusing on the automation of content creation and the development of personalized and adaptable learning journeys of individuals for future-ready skills, AI Co-Pilots ensure that individuals and organizations are not just keeping up with the pace of change but are poised to lead the way.


The Imperative for Organizations

For organizations, the transition to Learning 3.0 is not optional; it's imperative. The future business landscape will be dominated by those who can swiftly adapt to new technologies, harnessing the power of AI to foster a culture of continuous learning and innovation. Companies that cling to outdated L&D technologies risk falling irreversibly behind, much like those that failed to adapt to the advent of computers or the internet.


The Evolution of L&D Technology
The Evolution of L&D Technology

The journey from Learning 1.0 through Learning 2.0 to the pioneering realm of Learning 3.0 encapsulates the evolution of L&D from a function of content delivery to a strategic engine of growth, innovation, and adaptability. As we stand on the brink of this new era in educational technology, the message is clear: the future belongs to those who embrace the transformative potential of AI Co-Pilots, integrating them into the heart of their learning and development strategies. In doing so, organizations can bridge the skills gap, empower their workforce, and secure their place in the rapidly evolving business world.


 

GoodGist.com is one of the pioneers of the Learning 3.0 technology delivering AI Co-Pilots for Skill Development. 

 
 

10 views

Comments


bottom of page